Skip to content

Choosing a route

How to choose a hike beyond the difficulty label

Compare distance, climbing, route shape and missing information to build a shortlist that fits your day.

HikingTrailDirectory · Updated · 2 min read

Pick a route by the demands you can check: time, ascent, return logistics and local conditions. A colour-coded rating is only a starting point.

Start with the constraints of your day

Before opening a list of highly ranked trails, decide when you must be back and how you will reach the start. A route that fits a free weekend may not fit the gap between two bus departures. Write down the walking time available after travel, then reserve room for stops and uncertainty. This turns a vague search for a good hike into a usable shortlist.

Use distance and route shape as your first filters. Then open several route pages and compare the ascent and recorded surface. A short walk can still involve substantial climbing. If you are choosing for a group, discuss the route with the people who will walk it rather than using the fastest person's usual pace.

Read distance and ascent together

Consider two hypothetical options: 8 km with 700 m of ascent, and 12 km with 100 m. The first is shorter but contains much more climbing. Our directory's effort index adds kilometres to ascent divided by 100, giving 15 and 13 respectively. This comparison explains why sorting by distance alone can be misleading; it does not establish which outing is safer or technically easier.

Directory difficulty also considers gradient and certain source difficulty tags when present. It is not a complete terrain assessment. A map-derived label cannot tell you whether a damaged bridge has been repaired or whether today's surface matches the description. Read the source and the land manager's current information before settling on an option.

References: Our route data and calculation methods

Give each candidate a reason to stay on the list

A useful shortlist has distinct alternatives: one route with simpler return logistics, one with less ascent and one that fits a different time window. Three almost identical routes do little to help when your plans change. Compare the actual numbers and endpoints rather than assuming the first result is the best match.

Use the comparison tables on destination pages to open promising candidates. Those tables describe the displayed sample, not every possible walk in the area. A lowest-ascent result only means lowest among the sampled routes whose ascent is recorded; missing values are not zero.

  • Does the entire outing fit the time available?
  • Is the finish where your return journey begins?
  • Which important details are still unrecorded?
  • What makes your alternative meaningfully different?

Make the last check outside the directory

The National Park Service recommends choosing a hike suited to the group's abilities and checking conditions before departure. Treat the route page as the comparison stage and the responsible local authority as the source for current access and restrictions. Save the chosen route and the information needed to change your plan.

References: National Park Service: Hike Smart

Sources and further reading

Worked examples and directory calculations are explained in the article. External references support the sections where they appear; they do not certify any individual route. How we handle content and corrections.

Find routes to compare